Apply for MAST-P Support

Michigan manufacturers: Access capital and support services through the Michigan Auto Supplier Transition Program (MASTP) and position your business for the future of mobility.

Automation Alley Trade Missions

Your Gateway to New, High-Growth Markets.

Join The Project DIAMOnD Marketplace

Register for the Integr8 2027 Series

Why Manufacturers Need Design-to-Cost Before Cost Reduction

by | Nov 4, 2026

Summary

Manufacturers can achieve better cost control by adopting a design-to-cost strategy early in product development, integrating engineering, procurement, and supply chain insights to optimize costs while balancing quality, performance, and risk.

It’s a familiar scene: a product is approaching a key development milestone but projected cost is above target. Teams begin looking for ways to close the gap through supplier negotiations, RFQs, sourcing events, component substitutions, or design changes.

These efforts can still create meaningful savings. The issue is that now many of the decisions shaping the product’s underlying cost structure have already been made, narrowing the options available to address the cost overrun without affecting performance, quality, timelines, supply, or other product requirements.

That is the difference between cost reduction and design-to-cost. Cost reduction asks where cost can be removed from the product you’ve designed. Design-to-cost asks how to design a product that achieves the right cost and value in the first place.

Product Cost Is Created One Decision at a Time

Establishing target cost is a typical starting point in product development. It identifies where a product needs to land, but it doesn’t determine how the product gets there. As development progresses, decisions around materials, specifications, components, manufacturing processes, and suppliers each influence the product’s eventual cost and the requirements it can meet.

Consider a simple electric motor. Choosing aluminum instead of cast iron can affect material cost, weight, and manufacturing requirements. Adjusting dimensions or tolerances can affect both performance and manufacturing cost. Selecting die casting instead of machining can shift manufacturing expenses further, while standardized bearings or connectors create another opportunity to influence the numbers. The product’s final cost reflects the cumulative impact of these choices, helping explain both what it will cost and why.

That is why design-to-cost does not make cost the priority of every design decision. It makes cost an input to every relevant decision. By understanding what is driving cost at every stage of the development process, teams can make more informed tradeoffs between target cost and performance, quality, supply, and other requirements the product needs to deliver.

Read this article in full here.

Samsung SDS

Samsung SDS provides cloud and digital logistics services.
We build optimized cloud environment with Samsung Cloud Platform specialized for businesses, provide all-in-one management service based on 39 years of expertise in each industry, and boost work efficiency and customer service with our SaaS solution proven successful in many use cases. Your only partner to present reasonable answer to complex challenge of digital transformation is Samsung SDS.

More

Related

Michigan Auto Supplier Transition Program (MAST-P) Launches to Provide No-Cost Support to Small Manufacturers Exploring New Industries

Michigan Auto Supplier Transition Program (MAST-P) Launches to Provide No-Cost Support to Small Manufacturers Exploring New Industries

Michigan launched the Michigan Auto Supplier Transition Program to provide small and underserved automotive suppliers with funding, technical assistance, and advisory services to help them scale operations and transition from internal combustion engine production to electric vehicle and adjacent industries.